|
Scottish
Football Debate Kick
Off 6.30pm
Monday
28 September 2009.
The
chief Executive of the SFA Gordon Smith got events under way by
taking to his seat at the front of the auditorium looking less formal
than the rest of the panellists. He then broke into his opening
speech and stated 'its all the fault of the SFA.' Of course
it was all tongue in cheek but perhaps the comment was another sign
of a man sick of the hassle, criticism and pressures of his role and
problem ridden regime. At the same time there in spoke the words of
the man at the top of the tree in Scottish football, or then again is
he? Yes, Scottish football at administrative level and in terms of
league set up is complex, confusing and of course it currently has
many problems.
These
problems or challenges were the reason the great, good and some would
say bad of Scottish football gathered this week at a football
conference at Stirling University's MacRobert Arts Centre in
Stirling. The ongoing review into Scottish football, coupled with
well publicised challenges faced by the Scottish game made for lively
debate about Scottish football. The aim of this event was to
encourage debate towards decisions about possible solutions to some
of the present challenges facing the game.
Promoted
by the University as 'Scottish
Football under the Spotlight'
alongside the SFA Chief Executive Smith were Henry McLeish the former
First Minister and now the head of the latest review into Scottish
football; Iain
Blair
the SPL Operations Director; David
Longmuir SFL
Chief Executive, Fraser
Wishart PFA
Scotland Chief Executive and completing the list James
Proctor from Supporters
Direct. Jim Spence from the BBC chaired the events from the stage.
The
Discussion
A
variety of topics were attacked from the outset with Gordon Smith
kicking off by outlining his vision for increased athleticism,
technique and the achievement of a new mentality within the
Scottish game. Ultimately, Smith was keen to see a movement away
from the 'negativity' that he suggests haunts the Scottish
game. On the same vain, Ian Blair from the SPL went on to talk
about the extent to which Scottish football currently is 'ill
presented' by the media and fans. Whilst Smith had talked about
negativity, Blair was keen to root out the OTT criticism he
suggests comes the way of the SPL. Overall his solution and vision
was for those involved in the game to adopt a more 'positive
approach ' to how things are.

Then
matters went to the lower leagues as David Longmuir from the SFL
spoke of his desire to get '10% of the population from Scotland's
small towns into games of local teams.' Fraser Wishart meanwhile
talked about getting things right on the pitch, and then things he
suggest 'would go right in the stands.' Interestingly James
Proctor from supporters Direct talked with the most clarity of the
whole panel and suggested how clubs have to end the current mentality
of 'taking fans for granted.'
Henry
McLeish's early words were largely clichéd and politically driven
sentiments. Whilst Tony Blair once spoke and became the PM on the back of 'education,
education, education', Mr McLeish spoke of 'development,
development, development' and his faith in a newer 'learning
and ambitious' Scotland to embrace the changes he would
recommend.
The
Debate
Questions
from the audience to the panel were conducted by Jim Spence via a
Question Time style format. First up came calls from the audience
for a new pyramid
style
structure for the Scottish game. Some of the panel were supportive
of the idea but sceptical of the buying into the idea by current
member league clubs. Backing this up it was highlighted that only 5
applications to replace the liquidated Gretna suggested that
aspirations for league membership did not current exist in Scotland.
Against this, Fraser Wishart put forward the specific solution of a
two league system set up with regionalised leagues underneath as a
solution to the league structures problems.
The
debate then moved onto questions about the number of separate bodies
that run the Scottish game. Why does the SPL, SFL and SFA exist when
one all encompassing administrative body would allow greater decision
making and less bureaucracy. This led onto questions about how the
review and associated research could actually move onto positive
action and with it actual change.
After
prompting from Jim Spence a show of hands from the audience suggested
70% thought change would not be successfully achieved as a
result of the McLeish review. Afterwards prompts were made of the
issue of club ownership and for clubs to move towards being part of
the local community. Gordon Smith meanwhile spoke of the need for
improved financial management from top down, highlighting the current
financial problems faced by the major clubs in the English
Premiership. Then the audience spoke of the damage to game of SNP's
idea for free to air Scotland games. Increased investment by clubs
in face potential of political interference into Scottish football
from the current SNP regime. Gordon Smith spoke of his concern and
alarm at the suggestion from the Alex Salmond government that all
Scotland games should be free to air on the BBC. To wrap things up
some fans in attendance spoke of the value of the abandonment of the
reserve league via making participation voluntary. The question of
safe standing came to the fore near the end of the debate but it was
a mere token question; whilst James Proctor was positive about the
idea the rest of the panel were never allowed to comment.
The
Decisions
This
was not the first recent investigation into Scottish football by an
independent reviewing body. In the mid 1990's a whole host of
esteemed football people gathered to assess and recommend change for
the Scottish game. Amongst these were Ernie Walker, Tony Higgins,
Lars Christer Olsen, Martin Rose and most notably the former Dutch
national team manager Rinus Michels. Almost every change recommended
by the reviewing panel was rejected by the SFA at the time.
Whether
the reviewing capabilities and report from McLeish due to be
published in January 2010 actually recommends radical change for
Scottish football is open to question and certainly the audience
seemed to have little faith that it could either before, during and
after the event. To the credit of McLeish he mentioned a number of
times during the night that he would only be recommending changes and
had little control over whether any of these will be enforced. That
alone suggests he himself is doubtful of the willingness of those in
control to embrace wholesale change.
Reading
between the lines, my guess is that Henry McLeish far from
recommending radical wholesale change and league restructuring will
embark on chiefly recommending a new 'mindset' for Scottish football
to be adopted by fans, government and the games rulers. He will
possibly recommend a joint partnership between the government and the
SFA where innovative coaching ideas and new systems are to be
introduced. At the centre of this idea will be the promotion of
healthy living, increasing fitness levels and promoting increased exercise. In short,
the review of Scottish football will probably turn out to be a waste
of time as too many administrators in 'cushy number' jobs have too much to lose. Instead of actual practical change being enforced from this review via league structuring the solutions will be theoretical and jargon ridden. A massive cop out and a retention of the status quo will be the name of the game. The problem is, if it aint broke dont fix it may be the assumption of the SPL and Gordon Smith, but it is clearly not the view of the supporters who are crying out for new ideas and change.
Its
worth remembering that Rinus Michels who played a role in the last
review of Scottish football spoke about 'cutting out the cancers
within the game' quickly before rot sets in. It would be wrong
to wholly dismiss the SPL, SFA and SFL and its rulers here but
clearly there is a whole range of vested interest in the game from
those three and the debate suggested that they are quite happy with
the status quo and see no need for change.
But
then again, maybe I am just being negative?
|